Large numbers of European Jews flocked to Palestine, inflaming nationalist passions among all Arabs, who feared the creation of a Jewish state in which they would be the losers.
Fighting continued, almost all of it within the territory assigned to the Palestinian state AboutPalestinians fled or were expelled in the conflict. They were ordered to secure only the sections of Palestine given to the Arabs under the partition plan.
But these regular armies were ill equipped and lacked any central command to coordinate their efforts In reality, the Israeli offensive against the Palestinians intensified.
On December 19,he wrote: The Zionist enterprise so far There were literally hundreds of such statements made by Zionists. Publicly they all continued to speak of coexistence and to attribute the violence to a small minority of zealots and agitators.
But this was merely a public pose. Ben Gurion summed up: I support compulsory transfer. He hoped to see them flee. He said as much to his colleagues and aides in meetings in August, September and October . Official circles implicitly concede that the Arab population fled as a result of Israeli action — whether directly, as in the case of Lydda and Ramleh, or indirectly, due to the panic that and similar actions the Deir Yassin massacre inspired in Arab population centers throughout Palestine.
However, even though the historical record has been grudgingly set straight, the Israeli establishment still refused to accept moral or political responsibility for the refugee problem it — or its predecessors — actively created.
The records, and companion ones by a United States monitoring unit, can be seen at the British Museum. There was not a single order or appeal, or suggestion about evacuation from Palestine, from any Arab radio station, inside or outside Palestine, in There is a repeated monitored record of Arab appeals, even flat orders, to the civilians of Palestine to stay put.
The village was destroyed that night Khulda was leveled by Jewish bulldozers on 20 April Abu Zureiq was completely demolished Al Mansi and An Naghnaghiya, to the southeast, were also leveled. By mid, the majority of [the depopulated Arab villages] were either completely or partly in ruins and uninhabitable.
It has been repassed no less than twenty-eight times since that first date. Whereas the moral and political right of a person to return to his place of uninterrupted residence is acknowledged everywhere, Israel has negated the possibility of return Civilians caught in an area of military activity generally panic.
But they have always been able to return to their homes when the danger subsides.
Military conquest does not abolish private rights to property; nor does it entitle the victor to confiscate the homes, property and personal belongings of the noncombatant civilian population.WAS THE PARTITION OF INDIA IN INEVITABLE?
through the voice of its provincial assembly, had voted to remain whole it would have been next to impossible to divide India completely. In any event after the "great Calcutta communal killing" of August there was no going back; the course for partition was set.
Mar 03, · In , British Crown rule was established in India, ending a century of control by the East India Company.
The partition of was inevitable In August of , the nations of India and Pakistan celebrated their 65th year of independence from the British Raj - The partition of was inevitable introduction. The region known as the Middle East has been conquered and reconquered by every super power in the West. This has created a region rich in a culture of resistance and thousands of ethnic groups. Mar 03, · In , British Crown rule was established in India, ending a century of control by the East India Company. The life and death struggle that preceded this formalisation of .
The life and death struggle that preceded this formalisation of . India's History: Modern India: Announcement of Lord Mountbatten's plan for partition of India: 3 June The Plan. The British government sent a Cabinet Mission to India in March to negotiate with Indian leaders and agree to the terms of the transfer of power.
EBSCOhost serves thousands of libraries with premium essays, articles and other content including WAS THE PARTITION OF INDIA IN INEVITABLE?. Get access to over 12 million other articles! Was the Partition of India inevitable? In August of , the nations of India and Pakistan celebrated their 65th year of independence from the British Raj.
Although its significance was overshadowed by the Independence Day celebrations, August also marked 65 years since the tragic and violent partition of India and Pakistan.
THE partition of the subcontinent of India deserves to rank as one of the 10 great tragedies in recorded human history. That is saying a lot. It is not only the loss of human lives and property but the near-fatal blows on cultures that mark its distinctively hideous features.